WHEREAS, the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights are intended to protect the rights of individual human beings (“natural persons”); and,

WHEREAS, corporations are not mentioned in the Constitution and The People have never granted constitutional rights to corporations, and,

WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court recognized in Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) the threat to a republican form of government posed by “the corrosive and distorting effects of immense aggregations of wealth that are accumulated with the help of the corporate form and that have little or no correlation to the public’s support for the corporations political ideas,” and;

  WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court in Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission(2010) reversed the decision in Austin, and presents a serious threat to self-government by rolling back legal limits on corporate spending in the electoral process allowing unlimited corporate spending to influence elections, candidate selection, policy decisions and sway votes, and;

 WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court held in Buckley v. Valeo (1976) that the appearance of corruption justified limits on contributions to candidates, but it wrongly rejected other fundamental interests that the City Council finds compelling such as creating a level playing field and ensuring that all citizens, regardless of wealth, have an opportunity to have their political views heard, and;

 WHEREAS, money is property, it is not speech, and;

WHEREAS, Article V of the United States Constitution empowers and obligates the people of the states of the United States of America to use the constitutional amendment process to correct those egregiously wrong decisions of the United States Supreme Court that go to the heart of our democracy and the republican form of self-government;

THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED that it is the position of the Associated Students of the University of California , Irvine, that corporations should not receive the same constitutional rights as natural persons do and that because money is not speech, limits on political spending will promote the goals of the First Amendment by ensuring that all citizens, regardless of wealth, have an opportunity to have their political views heard.

LET IT BE RESOLVED, that council discuss spending limits for campaigns and resolutions on the UC Irvine campus;

LET IT BE RESOLVED, ASUCI work with UCI’s chapter of CALPIRG to publicize and educate our students about this issue;

LET IS BE FURTHER RESOLVED, this resolution should be presented to city and state officials along with a petition of support for campaign finance reform to fully demonstrate the position of our student body;

LET IT FINALLY BE RESOLVED, ASUCI through all its faucets, respectfully urge California’s Congressional delegation to prioritize congressional proposal of an amendment to the United States Constitution addressing the threats to representative government identified in this resolution so that the states may ratify it.